When will Utah’s Supreme Court decline extraordinary relief in election cases?
Utah’s highest court will not intervene in election disputes when doing so would cause voter confusion and disrupt the orderly administration of elections.
Utah’s highest court will not intervene in election disputes when doing so would cause voter confusion and disrupt the orderly administration of elections.
The Utah Supreme Court clarified that defendants can only appeal as of right when a court issues a new pretrial status order ordering detention, not when a court denies a motion to modify an existing detention order.
Utah Code section 76-1-306 supersedes State v. Pierce and requires judges to personally decide statute of limitations issues in criminal cases using a preponderance standard.
The Utah Supreme Court clarified that extraordinary relief is not available simply because petitioners speculate that district court proceedings might be too slow to meet statutory deadlines.
The Utah Supreme Court clarified the definition of adverse action in retaliation claims and addressed when appellate courts should remand versus apply new legal standards themselves.
The Utah Supreme Court clarified when prosecutors may refile criminal charges after dismissal at preliminary hearing, requiring evidence of bad faith or intent to harass rather than automatic restrictions.
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals throughout Utah, serving clients in all counties and courts across the state including: