Utah Supreme Court
Can unlicensed physicians conduct examinations in Utah for expert testimony? Allred v. AC&S Explained
Summary
This asbestos litigation case involved thirty-seven consolidated cases challenging the district court’s exclusion of an out-of-state medical expert. The court held that Dr. Schonfeld, an unlicensed physician, could conduct examinations in Utah to prepare for expert testimony without violating state medical practice laws.
Analysis
In Allred v. AC&S, Inc., the Utah Supreme Court addressed whether an out-of-state physician could conduct medical examinations in Utah without violating state licensing laws. This consolidated asbestos litigation case involved thirty-seven separate cases challenging the exclusion of a medical expert witness.
Background and Facts: Dr. Schonfeld, a physician not licensed to practice medicine in Utah, conducted physical examinations of plaintiffs in Utah as part of his preparation to testify as an expert witness in asbestos litigation. The district court found Dr. Schonfeld unreliable as an expert witness and unavailable to testify, concluding that his examinations violated the Utah Medical Practice Act.
Key Legal Issues: The central question was whether the Utah Medical Practice Act prohibited an unlicensed physician from conducting physical examinations in Utah for purposes of expert testimony preparation. This issue had significant implications for the availability of out-of-state medical experts in Utah litigation.
Court’s Analysis and Holding: The Utah Supreme Court reversed the district court’s summary judgment, holding that Dr. Schonfeld did not violate the Utah Medical Practice Act when he conducted examinations for litigation preparation purposes. The court determined that such examinations fell within permissible activities for unlicensed physicians when done specifically for expert testimony preparation rather than for treatment or diagnosis.
Practice Implications: This decision provides important guidance for practitioners utilizing out-of-state medical experts. Attorneys can confidently arrange for unlicensed physicians to conduct examinations in Utah when those examinations are specifically for expert testimony preparation. However, practitioners should ensure the examinations are clearly documented as litigation-related activities rather than medical treatment to maintain compliance with the Medical Practice Act.
Case Details
Case Name
Allred v. AC&S
Citation
2007 UT 66
Court
Utah Supreme Court
Case Number
No. 20050829
Date Decided
August 24, 2007
Outcome
Reversed
Holding
A physician unlicensed in Utah may conduct physical examinations in Utah for purposes of expert testimony preparation without violating the Utah Medical Practice Act.
Standard of Review
Correctness (summary judgment)
Practice Tip
When using out-of-state medical experts, ensure their examination activities fall within the litigation preparation exception to medical practice licensing requirements.
Need Appellate Counsel?
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Related Court Opinions
About these Decision Summaries
Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.