Utah Supreme Court

What constitutes criminal lewdness under Utah law? State v. Bagnes Explained

2014 UT 4
No. 20100882
February 14, 2014
Reversed

Summary

Bagnes was convicted of lewdness involving a child and sexual exploitation of a minor after dropping his pants to expose a toddler diaper he wore and distributing flyers showing diaper-clad children. The Utah Supreme Court reversed, finding insufficient evidence that his conduct constituted lascivious lewdness or sexual exhibition under the criminal statutes.

Analysis

In State v. Bagnes, the Utah Supreme Court clarified the boundaries of criminal lewdness involving a child and sexual exploitation of a minor, establishing important precedent for what conduct crosses the line from socially inappropriate to criminal.

Background and Facts

Barton Bagnes encountered two nine-year-old girls while they were riding bikes. He was wearing a candy binky and had his shorts positioned low enough to expose part of a diaper underneath. When questioned about the diaper, Bagnes dropped his shorts to his knees, fully exposing a toddler-sized diaper with an Elmo cartoon character. The diaper was too small for him and held together with clear tape, though it covered his pubic area. Bagnes also distributed flyers containing images of children and adolescents wearing diapers, some in arguably suggestive poses. The flyers contained URLs to websites with pornographic content, though the children never accessed these sites.

Key Legal Issues

The court addressed two primary issues: (1) whether displaying a diaper constituted an “other act of lewdness” under Utah Code § 76-9-702.5, and (2) whether the flyers depicted “lascivious exhibition” of children’s pubic areas under the sexual exploitation statute.

Court’s Analysis and Holding

The Utah Supreme Court applied the ejusdem generis canon to interpret “other act of lewdness,” concluding it must involve conduct similar in kind to the enumerated acts (sexual intercourse, exposure of private parts, masturbation). The court emphasized that lewdness requires lasciviousness – conduct involving irregular indulgence of lust – not mere social impropriety. Regarding the diaper display, the court found no evidence of virtual exposure, noting that diapers are among the most opaque clothing items imaginable. For the sexual exploitation charge, the court applied the Dost test but found no exhibition of the pubic region since the diapers completely obscured the children’s private parts.

Practice Implications

This decision provides crucial guidance for practitioners handling sexual offense cases. The court distinguished between socially inappropriate conduct and criminal behavior, requiring specific evidence of lascivious intent or virtual exposure. Defense attorneys can use Bagnes to challenge charges based on merely unusual or disturbing conduct that lacks the required sexual component.

Original Opinion

Link to Original Case

Case Details

Case Name

State v. Bagnes

Citation

2014 UT 4

Court

Utah Supreme Court

Case Number

No. 20100882

Date Decided

February 14, 2014

Outcome

Reversed

Holding

Conduct involving displaying a diaper to children and distributing flyers depicting diaper-clad children does not constitute criminal lewdness or sexual exploitation of a minor absent evidence of lascivious intent or virtual exposure of private parts.

Standard of Review

Sufficiency of evidence claims reviewed for whether competent evidence supports each element; statutory interpretation reviewed de novo

Practice Tip

When challenging sufficiency of evidence in sexual offense cases, carefully analyze whether the defendant’s conduct meets the specific statutory elements of lasciviousness or sexual exhibition, as social impropriety alone is insufficient for criminal liability.

Need Appellate Counsel?

Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Related Court Opinions

    • Utah Court of Appeals

    State v. Nuzman

    October 16, 2015

    Trial counsel did not render ineffective assistance where counsel consistently raised the defendant’s mental health issues throughout the proceedings, sought mental health court referral, requested release for treatment, and advocated for probation to continue mental health services.
    • Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
    • |
    • Standard of Review
    Read More
    • Utah Supreme Court

    Machock v. Fink

    May 16, 2006

    A creditor’s pre-foreclosure breach of guaranty complaint satisfies the Utah Trust Deed Act’s deficiency action requirements when the guarantor receives adequate notice that the creditor will pursue a deficiency and the creditor’s recovery is limited by the fair market value offset.
    • Appellate Procedure
    • |
    • Contract Interpretation
    • |
    • Property Rights
    Read More
About these Decision Summaries

Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.