Utah Court of Appeals

Must condominium associations appoint trustees for nonjudicial foreclosures? McQueen v. Jordan Pines Townhomes Explained

2013 UT App 53
No. 20110312-CA
February 28, 2013
Affirmed

Summary

McQueen purchased a condominium but failed to pay assessments. The Association conducted a nonjudicial foreclosure without appointing a qualified trustee, selling the unit to Exchange. McQueen sued to quiet title, claiming the foreclosure was invalid, and sought attorney fees.

Analysis

Background and Facts

Isaac McQueen purchased a condominium unit at Jordan Pines Townhomes in February 2006 and signed the required condominium declaration. After leasing the unit to tenants, McQueen fell behind on his assessment fees by $903.71. The Jordan Pines Townhomes Owners Association initiated nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings by recording a Notice of Lien, followed by a Notice of Default and Notice of Sale. Exchange Properties purchased the unit at auction for $3,312.76 and evicted McQueen’s tenants. McQueen filed suit seeking to quiet title and recover damages for slander of title.

Key Legal Issues

The central issue was whether the Condominium Ownership Act and Trust Deed Act require appointment of a qualified trustee for nonjudicial foreclosure of assessment liens. McQueen argued the Association’s foreclosure was ineffective because no qualified trustee was appointed. The Association contended that its attorney could properly conduct the sale without formal trustee appointment, and that the Condominium Ownership Act superseded Trust Deed Act requirements where they conflicted.

Court’s Analysis and Holding

The Utah Court of Appeals applied statutory interpretation principles, examining the plain language of both acts. The court concluded that Utah Code section 57-8-20(4)(b) requires assessment lien foreclosures to be conducted “in the same manner” as trust deed foreclosures. This incorporation by reference brings in the Trust Deed Act’s requirement for a qualified trustee. The court rejected the Association’s argument that only procedural requirements like timing and notice applied, holding that the trustee requirement was essential for a valid nonjudicial foreclosure. The court also denied McQueen’s request for attorney fees, finding his quiet title action did not arise under the condominium declaration.

Practice Implications

This decision establishes that condominium associations cannot simply delegate foreclosure authority to their attorneys without proper trustee appointment. The ruling clarifies that nonjudicial foreclosure procedures must comply with both the Condominium Ownership Act and Trust Deed Act requirements. Practitioners should note that the Legislature subsequently amended the statute in 2011 to address these issues prospectively, but the amendments do not apply retroactively to this case.

Original Opinion

Link to Original Case

Case Details

Case Name

McQueen v. Jordan Pines Townhomes

Citation

2013 UT App 53

Court

Utah Court of Appeals

Case Number

No. 20110312-CA

Date Decided

February 28, 2013

Outcome

Affirmed

Holding

A qualified trustee must be appointed to conduct a nonjudicial foreclosure of a condominium assessment lien under both the Condominium Ownership Act and Trust Deed Act.

Standard of Review

Summary judgment reviewed for correctness; statutory interpretation reviewed for correctness with no deference to the district court; attorney fees denial reviewed for correctness

Practice Tip

When conducting nonjudicial foreclosures of condominium assessment liens, always ensure a qualified trustee is properly appointed as required by the Trust Deed Act, even though the Condominium Ownership Act doesn’t explicitly mandate this step.

Need Appellate Counsel?

Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Related Court Opinions

    • Utah Court of Appeals

    Brown v. Richards

    April 8, 1999

    A prevailing party is entitled to attorney fees for work on overlapping compensable and non-compensable claims where the proof of the claims shares a common factual basis.
    • Attorney Fees
    • |
    • Contract Interpretation
    Read More
    • Utah Supreme Court

    Pulham v. Kirsling

    May 22, 2019

    A notice of appeal that specifically identifies only certain portions of a judgment limits appellate jurisdiction to those portions, and the court of appeals correctly upheld the district court’s child support and parent-time orders.
    • Appellate Procedure
    • |
    • Child Support and Alimony
    • |
    • Jurisdiction
    • |
    • Preservation of Error
    Read More
About these Decision Summaries

Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.