Utah Supreme Court
Can Utah require unwed fathers to file affidavits to preserve parental rights in adoption cases? Bolden v. Doe (In re Adoption of J.S.) Explained
Summary
William Bolden challenged Utah’s adoption statute requiring unwed fathers to file a sworn affidavit to preserve parental rights, arguing it violated due process and equal protection. The court affirmed the district court’s denial of his motion to intervene in the adoption proceeding.
Analysis
In Bolden v. Doe (In re Adoption of J.S.), the Utah Supreme Court addressed whether the state’s adoption statute unconstitutionally discriminates against unwed fathers by requiring them to file a sworn affidavit to preserve their parental rights.
Background and Facts
William Bolden was the putative father of a child born in 2011. When the mother decided to place the child for adoption, Bolden had filed a paternity petition and met most requirements of Utah Code § 78B-6-121(3), but failed to file the required sworn affidavit stating his ability and willingness to have custody, his childcare plans, and agreement to pay support. His attorney allegedly advised him this affidavit was not required. The prospective adoptive parents argued Bolden could not object to the adoption due to his noncompliance.
Key Legal Issues
Bolden challenged the affidavit requirement under three constitutional theories: substantive due process (claiming a fundamental right to parent without filing the affidavit), equal protection (arguing sex-based discrimination), and uniform operation of laws under the Utah Constitution. The central question was whether Utah could require unwed fathers, but not mothers, to demonstrate commitment through a sworn statement.
Court’s Analysis and Holding
The court applied intermediate scrutiny to the sex-based classification and found it substantially advanced important governmental interests in protecting children’s welfare and ensuring committed parents. The court distinguished unwed mothers and fathers based on biological differences, noting that mothers demonstrate commitment by carrying children to term while fathers require alternative means of showing dedication. Under substantive due process analysis, the court applied a deferential standard, finding no fundamental right to perfect parental status without statutory compliance.
Practice Implications
This decision reinforces that strict statutory compliance is essential in Utah adoption cases. Unwed fathers must satisfy all four requirements of § 78B-6-121(3): filing paternity proceedings, submitting the sworn affidavit, registering with the state, and paying pregnancy expenses. The court’s rejection of the attorney malpractice excuse emphasizes that procedural failures, even based on counsel’s advice, cannot overcome statutory deadlines in adoption contexts.
Case Details
Case Name
Bolden v. Doe (In re Adoption of J.S.)
Citation
2014 UT 51
Court
Utah Supreme Court
Case Number
No. 20120751
Date Decided
November 4, 2014
Outcome
Affirmed
Holding
Utah’s affidavit requirement for unwed fathers to preserve parental rights in adoption proceedings is constitutional under both due process and equal protection analysis.
Standard of Review
Correctness for constitutional challenges to statutory requirements
Practice Tip
When advising unwed fathers in Utah adoption cases, ensure strict compliance with all four requirements of Utah Code § 78B-6-121(3), including the sworn affidavit, as procedural missteps cannot be excused even with claims of attorney malpractice.
Need Appellate Counsel?
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Related Court Opinions
About these Decision Summaries
Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.