Utah Court of Appeals
Can you collect unemployment benefits while applying for disability? Unck v. Department of Workforce Services Explained
Summary
Unck applied for unemployment benefits claiming availability for full-time work but simultaneously applied for Social Security Disability benefits stating he was unable to work since one day after filing his unemployment claim. The Workforce Appeals Board ordered repayment of benefits and imposed a fraud penalty.
Practice Areas & Topics
Analysis
Background and Facts
Kevin Unck filed for unemployment benefits in October 2013, claiming he was available for full-time work. However, just one day after filing his unemployment claim, he applied for Social Security Disability benefits, stating he was unable to work since October 14, 2013. Unck continued receiving unemployment benefits while maintaining his disability application, relying on advice from a Social Security Administration employee that the applications would not interfere with each other.
Key Legal Issues
The case presented two primary issues: whether Unck was eligible for unemployment benefits while claiming disability, and whether his contradictory statements constituted fraud warranting penalties and benefit repayment.
Court’s Analysis and Holding
The Utah Court of Appeals applied deferential review to the Workforce Appeals Board’s determinations, treating them as mixed questions of fact and law that are more fact-like. The court held that a claimant who applies for disability benefits claiming inability to work is necessarily unavailable for full-time work under Utah Administrative Code R994-403-111c. The court found sufficient evidence supporting the Board’s fraud determination, noting Unck’s contradictory statements about his work capacity. Importantly, the court rejected Unck’s reliance on Social Security Administration advice, emphasizing that inquiries about Utah unemployment benefits should be directed to the Department of Workforce Services, not federal agencies.
Practice Implications
This decision establishes clear precedent that simultaneous disability and unemployment claims create inherent conflicts under Utah law. Practitioners should advise clients about the risks of pursuing contradictory benefit applications and ensure consistent statements across all proceedings. The court’s deferential standard of review highlights the importance of developing a strong factual record before the administrative agency rather than relying primarily on legal arguments on appeal.
Case Details
Case Name
Unck v. Department of Workforce Services
Citation
2015 UT App 201
Court
Utah Court of Appeals
Case Number
No. 20150043-CA
Date Decided
August 13, 2015
Outcome
Affirmed
Holding
A claimant who applies for Social Security Disability benefits stating inability to work is necessarily unavailable for full-time work and disqualified from unemployment benefits under Utah law.
Standard of Review
Deference – mixed question of fact and law that is more fact-like, with Board’s determinations entitled to deference because appellate court would be in inferior position to review correctness
Practice Tip
When challenging unemployment benefit determinations, focus on developing the factual record rather than legal arguments, as the Board’s fact-like determinations receive significant deference on appeal.
Need Appellate Counsel?
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Related Court Opinions
About these Decision Summaries
Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.