Utah Court of Appeals
When does Utah Code section 15-1-1's ten percent interest rate apply to judgments? Fuller v. Bohne Explained
Summary
The Fullers sued their insurance agency for negligent misrepresentation after being severely underinsured in a fire. The jury awarded $101,595 in damages, but the parties disputed the appropriate prejudgment interest rate. The trial court rejected the Fullers’ claim to ten percent interest under Utah Code section 15-1-1, instead applying the 2.27% postjudgment rate under section 15-1-4.
Practice Areas & Topics
Analysis
In Fuller v. Bohne, the Utah Court of Appeals clarified a crucial distinction in Utah’s prejudgment interest statutes that significantly impacts damage calculations in civil litigation.
Background and Facts
The Fullers owned a home and business that were destroyed in a 2007 fire. They sued their insurance agency, Western States Insurance Agency, for negligent misrepresentation after discovering they were severely underinsured and received only $3,000 in coverage. The jury awarded the Fullers $101,595 in property damages. The dispute centered on whether prejudgment interest should be calculated at ten percent under Utah Code section 15-1-1 or at a lower rate under section 15-1-4.
Key Legal Issues
The court addressed two primary issues: first, whether the parties had stipulated to a specific prejudgment interest rate, and second, which statutory provision governed the interest calculation for tort-based judgments versus contract-based claims.
Court’s Analysis and Holding
The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision, holding that Utah Code section 15-1-1 applies only to judgments arising from contracts “for the loan or forbearance of any money, goods, or chose in action.” The court relied on the Utah Supreme Court’s decision in USAPower, LLC v. PacifiCorp to limit section 15-1-1’s application to specific contract types. Since the Fullers’ claims sounded in tort, not contract, the court applied Utah Code section 15-1-4, which provides for the federal postjudgment interest rate plus two percent.
Practice Implications
This decision emphasizes the importance of understanding which interest statute applies based on the underlying cause of action. Practitioners should carefully analyze whether claims are truly contract-based or tort-based when calculating potential prejudgment interest. The distinction can be financially significant—here, the difference between ten percent and 2.27% annual interest substantially affected the damage award. Additionally, when stipulating to prejudgment interest, parties must clearly specify both entitlement and rate to avoid post-verdict disputes over calculation methods.
Case Details
Case Name
Fuller v. Bohne
Citation
2017 UT App 28
Court
Utah Court of Appeals
Case Number
No. 20150146-CA
Date Decided
February 9, 2017
Outcome
Affirmed
Holding
Utah Code section 15-1-1’s ten percent interest rate applies only to contract claims for loans or forbearances, not to tort-based judgments, which are governed by section 15-1-4’s postjudgment interest rate.
Standard of Review
Correctness for questions of law regarding statutory interpretation; Clear error for questions of fact regarding scope of stipulations; Abuse of discretion for trial court’s calculation of prejudgment interest
Practice Tip
When stipulating to prejudgment interest, ensure the agreement clearly specifies both entitlement and rate to avoid post-trial disputes over calculation.
Need Appellate Counsel?
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Related Court Opinions
About these Decision Summaries
Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.