Utah Supreme Court
Can courts dismiss custody petitions without a hearing? In re S.W. Explained
Summary
B.W.D. filed a petition seeking custody of her younger sisters after Father moved them to Kansas. The juvenile court dismissed the petition sua sponte, attributing Mother’s alleged misconduct to B.W.D. without giving her an opportunity to be heard. The Utah Supreme Court reversed, holding that B.W.D. was denied due process.
Practice Areas & Topics
Analysis
In a significant ruling addressing due process rights in child custody proceedings, the Utah Supreme Court in In re S.W. reversed a juvenile court’s dismissal of a custody petition that was decided without giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.
Background and Facts
B.W.D. filed a petition seeking custody of her younger sisters after their father moved them to Kansas with court approval. When the sisters visited Utah and subsequently ran away, staying with their mother, complex interstate jurisdiction issues arose. After the children were returned to Kansas under requisition orders, B.W.D. filed an amended petition requesting custody solely for herself. The juvenile court sua sponte dismissed the petition without giving B.W.D. a hearing, attributing the mother’s alleged misconduct to B.W.D. based on speculation rather than evidence.
Key Legal Issues
The case presented two main issues: whether Utah retained exclusive continuing jurisdiction under the Utah Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA), and whether the dismissal violated B.W.D.’s due process rights. The juvenile court had incorrectly applied both the inconvenient forum provisions and the unjustifiable conduct provisions of the UCCJEA.
Court’s Analysis and Holding
The Utah Supreme Court held that the juvenile court committed multiple errors. First, the court failed to follow proper procedures for an inconvenient forum analysis under Utah Code section 78B-13-207, which requires allowing parties to submit information. Second, the court misapplied the unjustifiable conduct test under section 78B-13-208, which only applies when jurisdiction exists because of misconduct, not when jurisdiction already existed from an initial custody determination. Most importantly, the court violated fundamental due process by dismissing the petition without giving B.W.D. an opportunity to be heard.
Practice Implications
This decision reinforces that courts must provide meaningful notice and opportunity to be heard before making adverse custody determinations. Practitioners should ensure proper briefing on jurisdictional issues and request hearings when courts consider dismissing petitions under the UCCJEA. The ruling also clarifies the proper application of the UCCJEA’s inconvenient forum and unjustifiable conduct provisions in interstate custody disputes.
Case Details
Case Name
In re S.W.
Citation
2017 UT 37
Court
Utah Supreme Court
Case Number
No. 20160295
Date Decided
July 17, 2017
Outcome
Reversed
Holding
A juvenile court violates due process when it dismisses a custody petition sua sponte without giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard.
Standard of Review
Correctness for jurisdictional determinations, clear error for factual findings underlying jurisdictional determinations
Practice Tip
Always request a hearing before any adverse jurisdictional ruling and ensure all parties have the opportunity to submit briefing on inconvenient forum analyses under the UCCJEA.
Need Appellate Counsel?
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Related Court Opinions
About these Decision Summaries
Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.