Utah Supreme Court
Can Utah divorcing parties arbitrate their disputes? Taylor v. Taylor Explained
Summary
After agreeing to arbitrate their divorce disputes, David Taylor moved to invalidate the arbitration award, arguing that arbitration agreements in divorce cases violate public policy. The district court denied his motion and confirmed the award.
Practice Areas & Topics
Analysis
In a significant decision addressing the intersection of arbitration law and family law, the Utah Supreme Court ruled in Taylor v. Taylor that divorcing parties may agree to arbitrate certain aspects of their divorce proceedings under the Utah Uniform Arbitration Act (UUAA).
Background and Facts
David and Jill Taylor were divorcing and had resolved custody matters but disagreed on alimony, child support, and property division. To expedite resolution and obtain favorable tax treatment, David proposed arbitration in lieu of trial. After the arbitrator issued an award, David changed counsel and moved to invalidate the entire award, arguing that arbitration agreements in divorce cases violate public policy.
Key Legal Issues
The court addressed whether: (1) David could challenge the arbitration agreement after participating without objection; (2) Utah law permits arbitration of divorce-related disputes; and (3) the arbitrator manifestly disregarded the law in calculating income and alimony.
Court’s Analysis and Holding
The court held that parties who participate in arbitration without objection cannot later contest the award by challenging the agreement’s validity under section 78B-11-107. The court distinguished between different types of divorce disputes: parties may arbitrate alimony and property division with limited judicial review under the UUAA, but child support and custody awards must remain subject to judicial review to ensure they serve the child’s best interests. The court also confirmed that district courts retain continuing jurisdiction to modify arbitration awards incorporated into divorce decrees.
Practice Implications
This decision provides important guidance for family law practitioners considering arbitration in divorce cases. While arbitration can offer efficiency and privacy, practitioners must carefully consider which issues are appropriate for arbitration and ensure clients understand the limited grounds for challenging awards. The decision also highlights the need for legislative clarification, as the court noted that other states have adopted specific family law arbitration statutes.
Case Details
Case Name
Taylor v. Taylor
Citation
2022 UT 35
Court
Utah Supreme Court
Case Number
No. 20191090
Date Decided
August 18, 2022
Outcome
Affirmed
Holding
Divorcing parties may agree to arbitrate alimony and property division disputes under the Utah Uniform Arbitration Act, but child support and custody awards must be reviewable to ensure they serve the child’s best interests.
Standard of Review
Correctness for legal conclusions regarding arbitration award review
Practice Tip
Parties who participate in arbitration without objection cannot later challenge the validity of the arbitration agreement under section 78B-11-107 of the Utah Uniform Arbitration Act.
Need Appellate Counsel?
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Related Court Opinions
About these Decision Summaries
Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.