Utah Supreme Court
Can a surviving settlor-trustee convey trust property to his new spouse? In re Estate of West Explained
Summary
After Hazel West died, her widower Herschel West, acting as sole trustee of their inter vivos trust containing their home, conveyed the property to himself and his second wife as joint tenants. The children from his first marriage, who were contingent beneficiaries under the trust, challenged the conveyance. The trial court found the trust was revoked by the conveyance, but the court of appeals reversed.
Analysis
In In re Estate of West, the Utah Supreme Court addressed whether a surviving settlor-trustee of an inter vivos trust can convey trust property to himself and his new spouse without breaching his fiduciary duties to contingent beneficiaries.
Background and Facts
Herschel and Hazel West created an inter vivos trust in 1986, naming their Provo home as the sole trust asset and themselves as trustees. The trust provided that after their deaths, the property would benefit their three adult children. After Hazel died in 1988, Herschel remarried and in 1991, acting as sole trustee, conveyed the property to himself and his second wife Marilyn as joint tenants. The children challenged this conveyance as a breach of Herschel’s fiduciary duties.
Key Legal Issues
The court addressed three critical questions: whether the trust authorized the trustees to revoke the trust by disposing of property, whether the surviving trustee could exercise powers previously held jointly, and whether the conveyance breached Herschel’s fiduciary duty as trustee.
Court’s Analysis and Holding
The Utah Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals and reinstated the trial court’s judgment. The court held that Herschel, as the surviving trustee, succeeded to all powers previously held by the joint trustees, including the power to dispose of trust property. Critically, the court determined that at the time of the conveyance, Herschel was not only the sole trustee but also the sole present beneficiary. The children’s interests were merely contingent and would not vest until the death of the surviving settlor.
Practice Implications
This decision reinforces the principle that settlor-trustees of revocable inter vivos trusts retain substantial control over trust assets during their lifetimes. When drafting such trusts, practitioners should carefully consider the timing of when beneficiary interests vest and whether the surviving settlor should retain full beneficial ownership. The decision also highlights the importance of clearly distinguishing between present and contingent beneficiaries in trust instruments.
Case Details
Case Name
In re Estate of West
Citation
1997 UT
Court
Utah Supreme Court
Case Number
No. 960260
Date Decided
November 28, 1997
Outcome
Reversed
Holding
A surviving settlor-trustee of an inter vivos trust may convey trust property to himself and his spouse without breaching his fiduciary duty when he is the sole present beneficiary, even though contingent beneficiaries exist.
Standard of Review
Correctness for questions of law, as the case presented only issues of law following a judgment on the pleadings
Practice Tip
When drafting inter vivos trusts where settlors serve as trustees, clearly define when beneficiary interests vest and whether the surviving settlor retains full beneficial ownership until death.
Need Appellate Counsel?
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Related Court Opinions
About these Decision Summaries
Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.