Utah Supreme Court
When does the appeal period begin for judgments that award attorney fees? Sittner v. Schriever Explained
Summary
Sittner filed a notice of appeal from a judgment dismissing his complaint and awarding attorney fees, but did not file until after a supplemental judgment fixed the fee amount. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal as untimely under Taylor v. Hansen, which held that the appeal period begins when judgment is entered even if attorney fee amounts remain undetermined.
Analysis
In Sittner v. Schriever, the Utah Supreme Court resolved an important timing issue that frequently arises in civil litigation: when does the appeal period begin for judgments that award attorney fees but reserve the amount for later determination?
Background and Facts
After obtaining a judgment against Gildea, Sittner filed a declaratory judgment action seeking to enforce his judgment lien following Gildea’s bankruptcy discharge. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants on March 25, 1997, dismissing Sittner’s complaint and awarding attorney fees, but expressly reserved the amount of fees for later determination. A supplemental judgment fixing the fee amount was entered on June 27, 1997, but was later vacated due to irregularities in the stipulation process. The trial court entered a final supplemental judgment on October 21, 1997. Sittner filed his notice of appeal on November 14, 1997.
Key Legal Issues
The central question was whether Sittner’s appeal was timely. The court of appeals had dismissed the appeal, relying on Taylor v. Hansen, which held that the appeal period begins when judgment is entered even if attorney fee amounts remain undetermined.
Court’s Analysis and Holding
The Utah Supreme Court overruled Taylor and established a new rule based on ProMax Development Corp. v. Raile. The court held that “in the interest of judicial economy, a trial court must determine the amount of attorney fees awardable to a party before the judgment becomes final for the purposes of an appeal.” Since the March 25 judgment failed to fix the fee amount, it was not final for appeal purposes until the October 21 supplemental judgment was entered.
Practice Implications
This decision provides crucial guidance for appellate practitioners. When a judgment awards attorney fees but reserves the amount for later determination, the appeal period does not begin until the supplemental judgment fixing the fee amount is entered. Practitioners should not feel compelled to file premature appeals from incomplete judgments, but should wait for the final determination of all awarded amounts before filing their notice of appeal.
Case Details
Case Name
Sittner v. Schriever
Citation
2000 UT 45
Court
Utah Supreme Court
Case Number
No. 981776
Date Decided
May 19, 2000
Outcome
Reversed
Holding
A judgment that awards attorney fees but fails to fix the amount is not final for purposes of appeal until the trial court determines the fee amount.
Standard of Review
Correctness for legal conclusions of the court of appeals
Practice Tip
When attorney fees are awarded in a judgment but the amount is reserved for later determination, wait until the supplemental judgment fixing the fee amount is entered before filing your notice of appeal.
Need Appellate Counsel?
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Related Court Opinions
About these Decision Summaries
Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.