The Role of Investigation in Utah Post-Conviction Cases

A PCRA petition is only as strong as the evidence behind it. Courts do not grant relief based on allegations — they grant it based on facts. And in post-conviction practice, the facts that matter most are often the ones that were never in the trial record: what witnesses would have said if they had been called, what was in the prosecution’s files that was never disclosed, what a thorough forensic analysis of the evidence would have revealed.

Post-conviction investigation is the process of finding those facts before the petition is filed. It is unglamorous, time-consuming, and often expensive — but it is the single most important factor in determining whether a PCRA petition survives initial review, proceeds to an evidentiary hearing, and ultimately produces relief.

---

Why Investigation Comes Before Filing

The PCRA petition itself must contain specific factual allegations supported by affidavits and documentary evidence. A petition that says “trial counsel failed to investigate alibi witnesses” without identifying which witnesses, what they would have said, and how their testimony would have affected the verdict is a conclusion — not an allegation — and will almost certainly be summarily dismissed.

To draft a petition that survives, counsel must know before filing:

• Which witnesses were not interviewed and what they would have said
• What was in the prosecution’s files that was not disclosed to the defense
• What forensic analysis of the evidence would reveal
• What trial counsel’s file contains about the decisions being challenged
• What the defendant told counsel and what counsel told the defendant

None of this information exists in the trial record. All of it must be obtained through investigation before the petition is filed — because the one-year deadline does not pause while investigation is conducted.

---

Key Investigation Targets in Utah PCRA Cases

Law enforcement investigation files. The police investigation of the underlying offense typically generates far more material than was ever disclosed to the defense. Supplemental police reports, investigative notes, recordings of witness interviews, photographs, and evidence logs are all part of the investigation file. In Utah, law enforcement records are accessible through the Government Records Access and Management Act (GRAMA) under Utah Code § 63G-2-101. A GRAMA request to the relevant law enforcement agency can produce records the defense never saw — and those records sometimes reveal Brady violations, witness statements inconsistent with trial testimony, or evidence pointing to alternative suspects.

Prosecution files. Prosecutors’ notes, correspondence with witnesses, and internal memoranda about the case may be accessible through GRAMA or through the discovery process available in PCRA proceedings. When the prosecution negotiated cooperation arrangements with witnesses, the documentation of those arrangements may be in prosecution files and may constitute Brady/Giglio material.

Trial counsel’s file. Trial counsel’s notes, correspondence with the defendant, case strategy documents, and investigation records reveal what counsel did — and what counsel chose not to do. In IAC cases, trial counsel’s file is often the most important documentary evidence: it shows whether counsel investigated the alibi, whether counsel consulted an expert, what advice was given about the plea, and whether counsel was even aware of key witnesses or arguments. Trial counsel’s file is obtainable through a subpoena in PCRA proceedings, and in some circumstances, the defendant’s own communications with counsel may be obtainable without counsel’s consent.

Witness location and interviews. Identifying and interviewing witnesses who were never called at trial — or witnesses who have since changed their account — is central to most PCRA investigations. This may involve locating people who have moved since the trial, speaking with family members, conducting interviews in person or by phone, and ultimately obtaining sworn affidavits from witnesses willing to testify on the petitioner’s behalf.

Forensic and scientific analysis. In cases involving scientific evidence — DNA, fingerprints, ballistics, fire investigation, toxicology — post-conviction review of the methodology used at trial, comparison against current scientific standards, and in some cases retesting of preserved evidence can produce powerful new results. Private forensic experts retained for post-conviction review have produced alternative findings in a significant number of Utah cases.

Court records and other proceedings. In cases involving cooperating witnesses, the cooperating witness’s own criminal proceedings — their charges, their plea, the government’s sentencing recommendation — may reveal the benefits they received for testimony that were never disclosed to the defense.

---

The Role of Private Investigators

Private investigators with post-conviction experience can be invaluable in PCRA cases, particularly for witness location and interviews. A PI who locates a witness who has moved, establishes rapport sufficient to learn what the witness would testify to, and documents that testimony in a form that can support an affidavit may produce the single most important piece of evidence in the case.

The PI’s investigation feeds the petition: the PI’s findings are converted into affidavits from the witnesses themselves (not from the PI about what the witness said — the witness must attest to their own testimony). The PI’s role is to find the witness and document what they know; the witness then provides the affidavit.

PIs in PCRA cases may also assist with reviewing the trial record for inconsistencies, locating documentary evidence in public databases, and coordinating access to witnesses who have moved out of state or are reluctant to cooperate without personal contact.

---

When Investigation Reveals Brady Material

One of the most significant outcomes of post-conviction investigation is the discovery of Brady material — exculpatory or impeachment evidence in the prosecution’s possession that was never disclosed. When a GRAMA request of law enforcement files reveals witness statements inconsistent with trial testimony, cooperation agreements never disclosed to the defense, or forensic results that undercut the prosecution’s theory, the post-conviction investigation has not only found evidence for the petition — it has established the Brady claim itself.

Brady violations discovered through post-conviction investigation are among the strongest PCRA grounds precisely because they satisfy the procedural bar exception: the claim could not have been raised before because the information was suppressed. The investigation that uncovers it is simultaneously the evidence for the Brady petition and the proof that the petitioner could not have discovered the claim earlier.

---

Documentation and the Affidavit

Every piece of information discovered in a post-conviction investigation must be preserved in a form the court can use. For witness testimony, this means a sworn affidavit — signed by the witness, based on their own personal knowledge, and stating specifically what they would testify to at an evidentiary hearing. For documentary evidence, this means authenticated copies of the original records with a chain of custody explanation.

Affidavits attached to PCRA petitions convert factual allegations into evidence the court must take seriously. A petition supported by three notarized affidavits from uncalled witnesses explaining what they would have testified to presents a fundamentally different challenge for the court than a petition with bare allegations that those witnesses existed.

---

KEY RULE

Investigation as the Foundation of Every PCRA Petition

A PCRA petition must contain specific factual allegations supported by affidavits and documentary evidence — conclusions and bare allegations are insufficient and produce summary dismissal. Post-conviction investigation targets include law enforcement files (accessible through GRAMA under Utah Code § 63G-2-101), prosecution files, trial counsel’s file, uncalled witnesses, forensic analysis of evidence, and cooperating witness records. Investigation must be completed before filing because the one-year deadline does not pause. Every investigative finding should be preserved in sworn affidavit form from the witness or document custodian who can authenticate it.

---

Starting the Investigation

The earlier investigation begins, the more thorough it can be before the one-year filing deadline arrives. Lotus Appellate Law coordinates post-conviction investigation as part of every PCRA engagement — identifying the investigative targets specific to the case, directing GRAMA requests and document subpoenas, locating witnesses, and developing the affidavit record needed to support the petition. Contact us to begin the evaluation.