Utah Court of Appeals
Must religious organizations prove federal tax-exempt status to avoid Utah unemployment insurance? Lowrey v. Workforce Appeals Board Explained
Summary
Gregory Lowrey challenged the Workforce Appeals Board’s decision that wages paid to Jacklyn Johnson by his religious entity UBU Ministries were subject to unemployment insurance contributions. The Board affirmed an administrative law judge’s determination that UBU did not qualify for the religious exemption from unemployment insurance requirements.
Practice Areas & Topics
Analysis
Background and Facts
Gregory Lowrey operated UBU Ministries, a religious entity that considered tattooing a core religious tenet, along with Happy Valley Tattoo. When employee Jacklyn Johnson filed for unemployment benefits, an administrative law judge determined her wages were subject to unemployment insurance contributions. Lowrey argued that Johnson was employed by UBU Ministries and that UBU qualified for the religious exemption from Utah’s unemployment insurance requirements.
Key Legal Issues
The court addressed whether UBU Ministries qualified for the religious exemption under Utah Code section 35A-4-205, which exempts employment by churches only if such services are also exempted under federal law. The case also involved procedural issues regarding Lowrey’s failure to properly marshal evidence supporting the Board’s factual findings.
Court’s Analysis and Holding
The Utah Court of Appeals applied strict construction to the statutory exemption, placing the burden on Lowrey to prove UBU’s entitlement to exemption. The court noted that federal law requires organizations to be exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Critically, Lowrey provided an IRS letter stating “We have no record that your organization has been recognized as exempt from Federal income tax.” The court held that simply asserting religious status was insufficient without proper documentation or independent proof of meeting statutory requirements.
Practice Implications
This decision emphasizes that religious organizations seeking exemptions from state employment laws must provide concrete evidence of their federal tax-exempt status. Practitioners should ensure clients have proper IRS documentation before claiming religious exemptions. Additionally, the court’s application of the marshaling requirement demonstrates that appellants challenging agency decisions must address all supporting evidence, not merely assert contrary positions.
Case Details
Case Name
Lowrey v. Workforce Appeals Board
Citation
2011 UT App 240
Court
Utah Court of Appeals
Case Number
No. 20100795-CA
Date Decided
July 29, 2011
Outcome
Affirmed
Holding
A religious entity claiming exemption from unemployment insurance requirements must provide documentation of federal tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3) or independently establish statutory requirements for exemption.
Standard of Review
Substantial evidence standard for agency findings of fact; strict construction for statutory exemptions with burden on claimant to prove entitlement
Practice Tip
When challenging agency decisions based on substantial evidence, appellants must marshal all evidence supporting the agency’s findings before arguing the findings are unsupported.
Need Appellate Counsel?
Lotus Appellate Law handles appeals before the Utah Court of Appeals, Utah Supreme Court, California Court of Appeal, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Related Court Opinions
About these Decision Summaries
Lotus Appellate Law publishes these summaries to keep practitioners informed — not as legal advice. Each case turns on its own facts. If a decision here is relevant to your matter, we’re happy to discuss it.