How a UPEPA appeal in Utah works: timing, steps, and fees

shooting a movie on a film studio protected under UPEPA and anti SLAPP laws.

A ruling on a UPEPA motion does not end the fight over a speech-based claim. It starts several clocks, and the statute decides who may stop them. UPEPA appeals in Utah run on short deadlines, an appeal right that belongs to one side only, and a fee-shifting provision that can make the appeal as expensive as the motion.

Why UPEPA appeals in Utah turn on timing

Utah’s Uniform Public Expression Protection Act builds timing into the litigation itself, and the clock starts before the ruling issues.

The stay before the ruling. Under Utah Code § 78B-25-104, once the motion is filed, “all other proceedings between the moving party and responding party, including discovery and a pending hearing or motion, are stayed.” That stay does not lift the moment the court rules. It “remains in effect until the day on which an order ruling on the motion under Section 78B-25-103 is entered and expiration of the time under Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 4, for the moving party to appeal the order.”

The stay during an appeal. If anyone appeals, the stay widens. The statute provides that “if a party appeals from an order ruling on a motion under Section 78B-25-103, all proceedings between all parties in the action are stayed.” That reaches parties who were never part of the motion. It also lasts: the stay “remains in effect until the day on which the appeal concludes.”

What keeps moving. The stay has exceptions. “A motion under Section 78B-25-110 for costs, attorney fees, and expenses is not subject to a stay under this section,” so the fee fight can proceed while the merits are on appeal. And “During a stay under this section, the court for good cause may hear and rule on” a limited set of matters the statute lists. Read the statute’s full list of exceptions before assuming the case is frozen.


Who can appeal a UPEPA ruling, and by what route

The answer depends on which side you represent and how the court ruled.

Key rule: “A moving party may appeal as a matter of right from an order denying, in whole or in part, a motion under Section 78B-25-103.” Utah Code § 78B-25-109

Moving party, motion denied. Section 78B-25-109 gives the moving party an appeal as of right from a denial, including a partial denial. No petition and no permission are needed. The statute ties the procedure to the ordinary appellate rules: “The appeal shall be filed in accordance with Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 4.”

Responding party, motion granted on every claim. The statutory appeal of right runs only to the moving party. If the ruling results in a final judgment, the responding party’s route is an ordinary appeal from that judgment under Rule 4, URAP.

Responding party, motion granted in part. A partial grant leaves claims pending, so there is no final judgment, and § 78B-25-109 gives the responding party no appeal of right. The remaining route is discretionary. Under Rule 5, URAP, “Any party may seek an appeal from an interlocutory order by filing a petition for permission to appeal from the interlocutory order with the appellate court with jurisdiction over the case.” The standard is demanding: a petition “may be granted only if it appears that the order involves substantial rights and may materially affect the final decision or that a determination of the correctness of the order before final judgment will better serve the administration and interests of justice.”

RulingWho seeks reviewRouteDeadline
Motion denied (whole or part)Moving partyAppeal of right, § 78B-25-10921 days after the date of entry of the order appealed from
Final judgment enteredParty appealingFinal-judgment appeal30 days after the date of entry of the judgment
Motion granted in partResponding partyRule 5 petition21 days after the entry of the trial court’s signed order
If a timely notice of appeal is filed by a partyAny other partyCross-appeal14 days after the date on which the first notice of appeal was filed, or the ordinary time if later

The UPEPA appeal deadline and the steps after the ruling

The deadlines

Rule 4 supplies two different windows. The general rule is that a notice of appeal “must be filed with the clerk of the trial court within 30 days after the date of entry of the judgment or order appealed from.” For an appeal from an order denying a UPEPA motion, the shorter window in Rule 4(a)(2) controls: “the notice of appeal must be filed with the clerk of the trial court within 21 days after the date of entry of the order appealed from.” Calendar 21 days, not 30, for a denial.

A Rule 5 petition runs on the same short clock: it “must be filed and served on all other parties to the action within 21 days after the entry of the trial court’s signed order resolving the motion or issue before the court.”

Post-judgment motions. In a final-judgment appeal, Rule 4(b) provides that “if a party timely files in the trial court any of the following, the time for all parties to appeal from the judgment runs from the entry of the dispositive order.” Check whether a motion you plan to file is on that list before relying on it to reset the time.

Extensions. “The trial court, upon a showing of good cause, may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal upon motion filed before the expiration of the time prescribed by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this rule.” “The trial court, upon a showing of good cause or excusable neglect, may extend the time for filing a notice of appeal upon motion filed not later than 30 days after the expiration of the time prescribed by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this rule.” Treat an extension as a fallback.

The steps

Notice of appeal. File it with the trial court clerk. Under Rule 3, URAP, “The appellant must serve the notice of appeal on each party to the judgment or order in accordance with the requirements of the court from which the appeal is taken.” Pay the filing fee. Timeliness is what matters most: “An appellant’s failure to take any step other than timely filing a notice of appeal does not affect the validity of the appeal but is ground only for the appellate court to act as it considers appropriate, including dismissing the appeal or other sanctions short of dismissal, and awarding attorney fees.”

Docketing statement. Under Rule 9, URAP, the appellant must file it with the appellate court clerk “Within 21 days after a notice of appeal, cross-appeal, or a petition for review of an administrative order is filed.” For a denial appeal, cite § 78B-25-109 as the jurisdictional basis.

Briefing. Under Rule 26, URAP, the appellant’s principal brief is due within 40 days after the appellate court clerk’s briefing notice. “The appellee must file and serve a principal brief within 30 days after service of the appellant’s principal brief.”


UPEPA attorney fees at trial and on appeal

The UPEPA’s fee provision is asymmetric, and it shapes the appeal decision on both sides.

Prevailing moving party. Under Utah Code § 78B-25-110, “the court shall award court costs, reasonable attorney fees, and reasonable litigation expenses related to the motion” “to the moving party if the moving party prevails on the motion.” The award is mandatory.

Prevailing responding party. The responding party’s path is narrow. Fees go “to the responding party if the responding party prevails on the motion and the court finds that the motion was frivolous or filed solely with intent to delay the proceeding.” Winning the motion is not enough. The court must also make that finding.

Voluntary dismissal. Under Utah Code § 78B-25-107(3), “A voluntary dismissal with prejudice of a responding party’s cause of action, or part of a cause of action, that is the subject of a motion under Section 78B-25-103 establishes for the purpose of Section 78B-25-110 that the moving party prevailed on the motion.”

Fees on appeal. The request must be made in the brief. Under Rule 24, URAP, “A party seeking attorney fees for work performed on appeal must state the request explicitly and set forth the legal basis for an award.” Cite § 78B-25-110 as that basis. Utah’s general rule supports carrying a fee entitlement through to the appeal: in Gardiner v. Anderson, 2022 UT 42, a contract fee case rather than a UPEPA case, the Utah Supreme Court reiterated that “Where a party entitled to attorney fees below prevails on appeal, [an] award of attorney fees on appeal is proper,” and it remanded “to the district court for the limited purpose of ascertaining the amount of those fees.”


A checklist for trial counsel handling UPEPA appeals in Utah

  • Calendar from entry. 21 days for a denial appeal or a Rule 5 petition; 30 days for a final judgment; 14 days for a cross-appeal after the first notice, or the ordinary time if later.
  • Responding party facing a partial grant. Decide quickly whether the order meets the Rule 5 standard; there is no appeal of right.
  • Map the stay. Know when the pre-ruling stay ends, and review the exceptions discussed above under “What keeps moving” before treating the case as frozen during an appeal.
  • Docket within 21 days. State the jurisdictional basis and at least one substantial issue.
  • Pursue fees on two tracks. Press the § 78B-25-110 motion below, and request appellate fees explicitly in the principal brief.
  • Know the extension windows for a notice of appeal. Rule 4(e) allows a motion filed before the time expires “upon a showing of good cause” and a motion filed within 30 days after it expires “upon a showing of good cause or excusable neglect.”

The UPEPA gives the moving party a fast appeal and a mandatory fee award, and it gives the responding party far less. People being sued over their speech keep the statute’s protection on appeal only by acting within weeks of the ruling.

Lotus Appellate Law — Contact us for a case evaluation

Meaningful appellate representation goes beyond filing a brief. It begins with understanding the trial record, identifying every issue worth pursuing, and knowing how Utah’s appellate courts actually decide cases. Lotus Appellate Law works with Utah litigants and trial counsel at the trial stage, on direct appeal, and through post-conviction proceedings — at the Utah Court of Appeals, the Utah Supreme Court, and beyond.

The next step is a conversation — schedule a call with Lotus Appellate Law.

Disclaimer

The content on our Insights page is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Every case is unique, and the law may have changed since publication. Reading this content does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please consult an appellate attorney about your specific situation.